Yes. Loading a map costs nothing, and there is no account or wallet connection. The scan runs against on-chain RPC on our side, so the only limit is a fair-use rate cap.

What counts as a cluster?

Wallets connected by on-chain history: one funded the other, or tokens moved between them. The scan checks those links across the top holders and groups connected wallets under one color. It does not guess from timing or balance shape, only from actual transfers.

How many holders does the scan cover?

You choose the depth, up to the top 500 holders. The map covers those wallets and the links between them. Holders below the cutoff exist but are not drawn, so treat the picture as the top of the book, not the whole book.

Where does the data come from?

Two on-chain sources: the token's holder accounts read over RPC, and a transfer-link scan across those holders. The trending list comes from Jupiter and is cached for about a minute. Nothing is manually labeled.

Yes. The token address sits in the URL, so copying the link reproduces the same view for anyone. They will see a fresh scan of the same token, which may differ slightly if holders moved in between.

Does a big cluster mean the token is a scam?

Not by itself. Exchanges, market makers, and team vesting can all look like large connected groups. What the map gives you is the question to ask. Check who the linked wallets are and how much of the supply they control before you judge.